Former Pakistani captain Shahid Afridi recently made headlines with his candid remarks about the dynamics and administration of cricket in Pakistan. Speaking at a ceremony, Afridi asserted that meritocracy should be the primary consideration in team leadership selections, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness.
Afridi in favor of Rizwan
Shahid Afridi highlighted the importance of impartiality in his opinions regarding team leadership, questioning the ethical implications of advocating for a player based solely on their surname. He expressed his support for Mohammad Rizwan’s captaincy in white-ball cricket and called for Babar Azam to lead the red-ball format.
However, it was his bold assertion that he could have potentially become the chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had he lobbied in the affairs of the national team that caught the attention of many. “If I had lobbied in the affairs of the national team, I would have been the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman”,stated Afridi.
As a former captain and one of the most revered cricketers in the country, Afridi’s opinions carry significant weight and influence. His willingness to speak openly about these issues reflects his dedication to improving the standards and integrity of cricket administration and governance in Pakistan.
Also read: PCB Holds Emergency Meeting With Shaheen Shah Afridi Over Statement Furore
Afridi’s comments have sparked a much-needed conversation about the need for transparency and meritocracy in cricket administration in Pakistan. As the country gears up for the T20I World Cup later this year, Afridi’s bold statements may have a significant impact on team selections and leadership decisions.
What do you think of the story? Share your thoughts and stay tuned for more latest news.
